The supreme court has recently released its decision on the lethal injection protocol challenge baze v. Merging eighth amendment precedents into a new standard for method of execution challenges. Merits briefs brief for petitioner ralph baze, et al. Bucklew confirmed this courts view that the test for challenges to lethal injection protocols announced in baze and glossip. May, 2014 challenging death penalty protocols under baze v. Reflections on justice john paul stevenss concurring. Mycspan users can download four congressional hearings and proceedings under four hours for free each month. Rees announces a standard for evaluating the constitutionality of lethal injection procedures that embraces the concept of risk, unlike the inherent cruelty standard that this court established in jones and has since applied to. The majority 72 ruled that the practice is only constitutional if enacted correctly. Rees 1 will rule on the constitutionality of the threedrug regimen currently used for lethal. Amr 510312008 yesterdays us supreme court ruling in baze v. The supreme court attempted to address these challenges in baze v. Reesconcurrence thomas wikisource, the free online.
Brief amicus curiae of the criminal justice legal foundation in support of respondents interest of amicus curiae the criminal justice legal foundation cjlf 1 is a nonprofit california corporation organized to partici. Pdf since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976 by the supreme court in gregg v. If an insufficient dose is initially administered through the primary iv site, an. The supreme court of the united states scotus is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the united states. Court took up the lethal injection issue in baze v. Rees, the supreme court broke decades of silence regarding state execution methods to declare kentuckys lethal injection protocol constitutional, yet the opinion itself did not offer much guidance.
Pdf current issues involving lethal injection researchgate. Public amnesty international the pointless and needless extinction of life usa should now look beyond lethal injection issue to wider death penalty questions 17 april 2008 ai index. Ralph baze and thomas bowling were sentenced to death in kentucky, each for a doublemurder. Kentucky department of corrections civil action no. Bowling were each convicted of two counts of capital murder and sentenced to death. The state successfully opposed arguments by lightbourne and schwab that their cases should be delayed until after the supreme courts decision in baze, and this court eventually decided those cases in the states favor while baze was still pending.
Rees aclu amicus brief american civil liberties union. Rees syllabus team members must have at least one year of relevant professional experience, and the presence of the warden and deputy warden in the execution chamber allows them to watch for iv problems. Nov 26, 2007 download november 26, 2007 argument calendar pdf click here for 2006 docket many documents listed on this page are pdf files that may be viewed using adobereader. We now conclude in light of the supreme courts latest explication in bucklew that the district courts judgment should be affirmed. Download pdf in the court of appeals state of arizona division one aaron jaydon nowell, petitioner, v. Rees, judge tem of the superior court of state of arizona, in and for county of maricopa, respondent judge, state of arizona, real party in interest. Download pdf open epub full article content list abstract. Rees legal information institute cornell university.
Rees, 2 the court affirmed the constitutionality of the threedrug proto col used in lethal injections in the united states, holding that a states. In this article i discuss in detail the courts holding in baze v. Rees plurality opinion as the basis for imposing the requirement even though this position was not taken by a majority of the members of the baze court, the court also takes the baze plurality opinions requirement out of its specific context and now imposes it on all execution method challenges. Scholarly commons human factors and applied psychology. Supreme court following oral arguments in the case of baze v. Rees,1 the supreme court of the united states considered whether kentuckys threedrug lethal injection protocol violated the eighth amendment to the united states constitution.
Rees 041608 and unnecessary infliction of pain, torture, 2 baze v. Gross, remanded the case to allow bucklew to identify a feasible, readily implemented alternative procedure that would significantly reduce his alleged risk of pain. Request pdf physicians and execution this spring the u. Typically it can take around a decade from conviction to execution. Supreme court upheld the constitutionality of kentuckys lethal injection protocol, which utilizes a threedrug combination to execute. On november 22, 2006, the kentucky supreme court judge wintersheimer affirmed the decision of the circuit court, holding that the lethal injection procedures as modified would not violate the rights of the plaintiffs to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the. Joint appendix volume iv amicus briefs brief for the american civi liberties union of kentucky and the rutherford institute in support of pet. The inmates contended that although the anesthetic used in the protocol could. Rees, glenn haeberlin, and ernie fletcher, were appellees below.
The state successfully opposed arguments by lightbourne and schwab that their cases should be delayed until after the supreme courts decision in baze, and this. Two inmates in the kentucky prison system questioned the use of the three drugs used in combination for lethal injection, claiming it violated the eighth amendment. Rees, 2 the court affirmed the constitutionality of the threedrug proto col used in lethal injections. Participants spoke to reporters on the steps of the u. American civil liberties union foundation 919 6825659. April 16, 2008 facts the eighth amendment to the u. Where it is feasible, a syllabus headnote will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. On january 7, 2008, the supreme court heard oral argument in baze v.
Rees upholding the constitutionality of kentuckys lethal injection procedures will in all likelihood be followed by moves in various us jurisdictions to resume executions, although the ruling is unlikely to stop litigation on this issue. Rees, condemned inmates challenged kentuckys threedrug lethal injection protocol based on a claim that it violated the eighth amendments prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Gross 01152015 serious illness and needless suffering. They argued that executing them by lethal injection would violate the eighth amendment. View essay baze vs rees case brief2015 final from criminal j 300 at metropolitan state university of denver. The kentucky supreme court upheld their convictions and sentences on direct appeal. Constitution protects people from cruel and unusual punishment, but the supreme court has ruled that it does not prevent the government from using the death penalty. Because kentucky conducted only one execution by lethal injection, the court had a limited access to judge the risks. Supreme court upheld the constitutionality of kentuckys lethal injection protocol, which utilizes a threedrug combination to execute death row inmates. Antideathpenalty advocates then pressured pharmaceutical companies to prevent sodium thiopental and, later, another barbiturate called pentobarbital from being used in executions. Rees, a case concerning the death penalty and kentuckys form of lethal injection. The road to abolition the future of capital punishment in the. Court of appeals eighth circuit, applying supreme court precedent in baze v.
In baze, a court plurality held that prisoners who challenge a method of execution must show the court an alternative method of execution that imposes less risk of unnecessary pain. Jul 31, 2008 however, in psychological terms there is no doubt that baze v rees is a setback for the abolitionist movement. After another saline flush, the inmate is finally administered. Rees ppt street law case summary baze v rees argued. Death row inmates must complete their appeals before an execution date can be set.
Following a saline flush, the inmate is injected with fifty milligrams of pancuronium bromide, a neuromuscular blocking agent used to paralyze the inmates voluntary muscles. Download november 26, 2007 argument calendar pdf click here for 2006 docket many documents listed on this page are pdf files that may be viewed using adobereader. The courts decision in furman v georgia 35 in 1972 struck down capital penalty statutes across the united states on the grounds that such laws as then implemented amounted to a violation of the eighth amendments cruel and unusual. Glenn haeberlin has since been replaced by thomas simpson as warden of the kentucky. Rees, the supreme court broke decades of silence regarding state execution methods to declare kentuckys lethal injection protocol constitutional, yet the opinion itself did. Jan 07, 2008 on january 7, 2008, the supreme court heard oral argument in baze v. Ralph baze and thomas bowling are still on death row in kentucky. Baze responded that living in prison was suffering, and then proceeded to give some examples of abuse inmates allegedly suffer at the ksp. Genzer, benjamin 3232016 for educational use only baze v. November 16, 2007 monday, january 7 1 075439 baze v. During the interview steven brown commented that there were some people who felt that baze should suffer when put to death.
969 780 477 1116 314 673 141 1474 928 272 947 158 1429 896 178 107 1466 917 1204 909 945 309 321 1470 440 901 1439 30 41 1383 481 660 304 454 206 244 1476